Nuclear Site Nears End of Its Conversion to a Park (Published 2006) (2024)

Advertisem*nt

SKIP ADVERTIsem*nT

Supported by

SKIP ADVERTIsem*nT

Nuclear Site Nears End of Its Conversion to a Park (Published 2006) (1)

By Christopher Maag

Correction Appended

FERNALD, Ohio, Sept. 19 — In about two weeks, the final trainload of radioactive waste is to leave the Fernald nuclear site.

The train will carry 5,800 tons of contaminated soil in 60 railcars, just like the 196 trains before it, which have run for seven years to a Utah dump from this scarred, cratered patch of land in the hills of southern Ohio.

“I never thought I’d live to see this day,” said Johnny Reising, who directs activity at the site for the Department of Energy.

This fall, the site will open to the public as a natural, undeveloped park following a 13-year, $4.4-billion cleanup. That is actually a bargain. Experts had originally estimated that cleanup would cost $12 billion and take until 2025.

“I remember touring the site in the 80’s and thinking, ‘My golly, how are we ever going to clean this up?’ ” said Graham Mitchell, who oversaw the site for the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency for 21 years until he retired this month.

From the time it opened in 1951 until it closed in 1989, the Feed Materials Production Center in Fernald enriched 500 million pounds of uranium, 67 percent of all the uranium used in the nation’s cold war nuclear weapons program.

Image

The center also created 1.5 billion pounds of radioactive waste, Mr. Reising said. It operated in obscurity until 1985, when neighbors discovered that the plant’s waste had polluted their air, soil and drinking water.

The neighbors sued, and the resulting news coverage prompted similar revelations at nuclear facilities around the country.

The site originally included a leaky silo filled with highly radioactive uranium sludge. At the time it was the largest concentration of poisonous radon gas in the world, Mr. Reising said. Officials at the Fernald center dumped radioactive waste into pits just 20 yards from a creek that sits directly atop the Great Miami Aquifer, one of the biggest and cleanest aquifers east of the Mississippi, Mr. Mitchell said.

Rainwater carried uranium into the creek, where it sank and contaminated 225 acres, or about 0.062 percent of the aquifer, according to figures on the Web site of the Fernald Citizens Advisory Board, which represented the center’s neighbors through the cleanup process.

When the Department of Energy ran out of room to bury waste at the 1,050-acre Fernald site, officials ordered it packed into 100,000 metal drums, which were left outside, exposed to the elements. Accidental releases covered 11 square miles of surrounding farmland in radioactive dust.

“When we first visited the site, I saw workers walking around in short-sleeve shirts, and their arms were covered with radioactive yellowcake,” said Lisa Crawford, president of Fresh, a citizen’s group that fought for cleanup at Fernald.

The original plan called for moving all the radioactive waste from Fernald to Nevada. Citizens and regulators gradually decided the plan was so expensive that it might never happen. “It took us years to realize how much dirt we were actually talking about,” said Jim Bierer, chairman of the citizens board.

In the final compromise, the federal government agreed to move 1.3 million tons of the most contaminated waste to storage sites in Texas, Nevada and Arizona. Citizens agreed to place the rest — 4.7 million tons — in a landfill at Fernald.

Image

Today, the waste site resembles a long, fat worm. Filled with uranium-laced soil, building parts and shreds of clothing, the landfill is 30 feet deep, with another 65 feet above ground, and is three-quarters of a mile long.

The landfill’s outer wall of rock, plastic and clay is nine feet thick and sits 30 feet above the aquifer. It is designed to last at least 1,000 years.

At its peak, the cleanup effort employed 2,000 workers, as many people as worked at the center during the height of uranium production, Mr. Reising said.

The Department of Energy spent $216 million on buildings just to clean the site. When the buildings were no longer needed, each one had to be demolished, decontaminated and placed in the landfill. The department also built a pumping system to suck contaminated water out of the aquifer and purify it. That process will continue until the entire aquifer is clean, in about 2023, Mr. Reising said.

When the site opens as a park, the landfill will be off-limits to the public. The remaining 930 acres will include hardwood forest, prairie and wetlands intended to recreate the area’s natural environment before European settlers arrived in the early 1800’s, Mr. Reising said.

Native bird species not seen in the area for decades, including bobolinks and dickcissels, have been spotted at Fernald, as have endangered species including the Indiana brown bat and Sloan’s crayfish. Deer wander the roads, and great blue herons stand motionless in ponds.

Humans have started to return, too. For decades, home values around Fernald stagnated because no one wanted to live near a nuclear waste dump, Mr. Bierer said.

Now two subdivisions are under construction within a mile of Fernald.

“It seemed to take forever,” Mr. Bierer said. “Basically we started with a huge environmental disaster and ended up with an environmental asset.”

Correction: Sept. 22, 2006

An article on Wednesday about the conversion of the Feed Materials Production Center in Fernald, Ohio, into a park misstated the mission of the center in America’s cold war nuclear weapons program. It purified uranium, it did not enrich it.

See more on: Environmental Protection Agency, Energy Department, U.S.

Advertisem*nt

SKIP ADVERTIsem*nT

Nuclear Site Nears End of Its Conversion to a Park (Published 2006) (2024)

FAQs

Is there still radiation at Rocky Flats? ›

Removal of the plant and surface contamination was largely completed in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Nearly all underground contamination was left in place, and measurable radioactive environmental contamination in and around Rocky Flats will probably persist for thousands of years.

Where is the largest nuclear waste site in the United States? ›

The Hanford Nuclear Site is located in eastern Washington State, and encompasses more than 500 square miles of land. For nearly 30 years, The U.S. Department of Defense and the Department of Energy produced tons of plutonium for use in the atomic weapon program.

What did they do at Rocky Flats? ›

The Rocky Flats Plant operated from 1952 until 1989 as part of the United States' nationwide nuclear weapons complex. The facility manufactured trigger mechanisms for nuclear weapons from various radioactive and hazardous materials.

What is buried at Rocky Flats? ›

Today, the plant and all buildings are gone. The site is contaminated with residual plutonium due to several industrial fires that occurred on the site and other inadvertent releases caused by wind at a waste storage area.

What is the most radioactive contaminated place on earth? ›

No. 1 Chernobyl – Ukraine

The Chernobyl Disaster has been burnt in history as the worst nuclear catastrophe and has the dubious distinction of being the most radioactive place on earth.

Is it safe to live near Rocky Mountain Flats? ›

A post-cleanup Centers for Disease Control study found that no public health concerns exist. The Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment conducted three separate community cancer studies around Rocky Flats, two of them recently.

Who cleaned up Rocky Flats? ›

Completed the first successful cleanup of a former nuclear weapons facility 60 years ahead of schedule and $30 billion under budget. The federal government created the Superfund program in 1980 to clean up the country's most dangerous abandoned toxic waste sites.

Can you visit Rocky Flats? ›

Designated trails and parking areas are open to visitor access from sunrise to sunset, seven days a week, and are open most federal holidays (closed on Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year's Day).

Why is radiation so high in Colorado? ›

For example, people residing in Colorado are exposed to more natural radiation than residents of the east or west coast because Colorado has more cosmic radiation at a higher altitude and more terrestrial radiation from soils enriched in naturally occurring uranium.

What is the radioactive contamination in Denver? ›

Background. The Denver Radium site is located in Denver, Colorado, along the South Platte River Valley. The site consists of over 65 properties contaminated by radioactive residues derived from the processing of radium ore in the early 1900s.

Are there any nuclear power plants in Colorado? ›

Currently, Colorado does not have any nuclear power plants or any plans for future power plants. According to the Colorado Energy Office (CEO), the state's only nuclear generating facility, Fort St. Vrain, generated electricity from 1976 to 1989.

What does a plutonium pit look like? ›

A key part of these warheads are plutonium “pits,” which are spherical shells of plutonium about the size of a bowling ball.

Is there still radiation from Three Mile Island? ›

In 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced that, although it was possible to further decontaminate the Unit 2 site, the remaining radioactivity had been sufficiently contained as to pose no threat to public health and safety.

What is the most radioactive spot in NYC? ›

This Corner on the Brooklyn-Queens Border is the Most Radioactive Spot in New York City. This Hidden City recently published this fantastic bit of New York History detailing how the corner of Irving Avenue and Moffat Street on the Bushwick-Ridgewood border became the City's most radioactive spot.

Does the Chernobyl plant still have radiation? ›

Iodine, strontium and caesium were the most dangerous of the elements released, and have half-lives of 8 days, 29 years, and 30 years respectively. The isotopes Strontium-90 and Caesium-137 are therefore still present in the area to this day. While iodine is linked to thyroid cancer, Strontium can lead to leukaemia.

Is Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge safe? ›

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service told Reuters in an emailed statement that it is “confident in the results of the cleanup at Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge" and in federal and state public health findings that the refuge is safe and not considered polluted.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Trent Wehner

Last Updated:

Views: 6297

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (76 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Trent Wehner

Birthday: 1993-03-14

Address: 872 Kevin Squares, New Codyville, AK 01785-0416

Phone: +18698800304764

Job: Senior Farming Developer

Hobby: Paintball, Calligraphy, Hunting, Flying disc, Lapidary, Rafting, Inline skating

Introduction: My name is Trent Wehner, I am a talented, brainy, zealous, light, funny, gleaming, attractive person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.