Former US Nuclear Weapons Plant Undergoes Amazing Transformation (2024)

The Fernald Preserve in Ohio is home to deer, turkeys, muskrat and many other creatures, including 200 species of birds.

However, not too long ago, the same site housed a facility that processed uranium ore for weapons. The plant spewed radioactive uranium dust into the air and contaminated the local water supply.

Since the plant's closing in 1989, the former nuclear weapons site has traveled a dangerous and expensive path to recovery.

Former US Nuclear Weapons Plant Undergoes Amazing Transformation (1)

Secret plant

For years, most residents of southwestern Ohio thought the Fernald Feed Materials Processing Center was a Purina dog food plant.

The name and the distinctive red and white checkered water tower may have been intended to give just that impression. But for nearly four decades, the facility was actually processing uranium ore and feeding it to weapons plants elsewhere in the country.

The plant operated around the clock, seven days week, employing several thousand people over its four decades. Engineer Cathy Glassmeyer started working at Fernald in 1985, just a few years before it closed. She says it was a great place to work. The plant's employees were a close-knit community, drawn together by the secrecy surrounding their work and pride in their contributions to the nation's defense.

"It did have a good culture of family almost. Some people had worked here their whole lives," says Glassmeyer. "There were a lot of people who met and got married from here. And everybody ate in the company cafeteria, from the company presidents on down to the lowliest porters who mopped the floors."

A darker side to Fernald culture

Operated by for-profit companies under government contract, production was the top priority.

Workplace safety and environmental concerns seemed to have been secondary concerns at best. As an example, Glassmeyer points to a lack of documentation in the facility.

"We found out that none of the valves in the building had numbers, none of the lines had identifying labels, because all of the old guys who worked here knew what everything was. Well, at that time, turning over to a new generation, we were all coming in, going, 'We don't want to guess.'"

Treated in an equally cavalier fashion was the 340,000 metric tons of radioactive waste generated over the years by the uranium extraction process.

It was stored right on the property.

"It had to go somewhere," says Jane Powell, current manager of the Fernald site. "It started out being disposed of in unlined pits, then lined pits, then - when that wasn't possible - it was put into drums."

Shocking discovery

Fernald's waste emitted relatively low levels of radiation. But the facility was also storing highly radioactive waste from other weapons plants. It was this more dangerous waste that first brought Fernald to the attention of local environmental activist David Fankhauser.

Fankhauser is a professor of biology at the nearby University of Cincinnati.

He recalls doing a radiation survey around the perimeter of the plant with two members of the Sierra Club. "I had what's called a scintillation counter that detects gamma radiation, and as we drove along the road, I took readings and plotted how far we had gone and there was a clear, dramatic increase in radiation at one point."

What Fankhauser detected in the early 1980s turned out to be nuclear waste created 40 years earlier as part of the Manhattan Project, America's World War II drive to build an atomic bomb.

Fankhauser says when he published his findings, the local press scoffed at his concerns. But soon after, it was revealed that the plant was also spewing radioactive uranium dust into the air, and contaminating the local water supply.

Then, he says, the community took notice and the press did an abrupt about-face.

Public outrage

"Well, suddenly, it was like somebody threw the switch," Fankhauser says. "And I'll never forget that first Enquirer [local newspaper] headline, talking about radioactive releases from Fernald and finally looking at what were clearly dangers to the genetic material of people that lived in that neighborhood."

Fernald was closed in 1989, and the more dangerous, high-level waste - about 20 percent of the total - was shipped to disposal sites in Western states.

The remaining 80 percent was entombed in a 720 meter long, grass-covered mound, 20 meters high, that runs along one edge of the property. Surrounded by a stone moat and razor-topped fencing, the mound is a series of clay-lined containment cells. Inside the cells are 40 years worth of nuclear waste, contaminated soil and the remains of Fernald's 300 buildings.

The rest of the 420-hectare site makes up the nature preserve.

Former US Nuclear Weapons Plant Undergoes Amazing Transformation (3)

Uncertain future

When the Fernald plant closed, its future development was unclear.

Government officials decided to open the question of how to retire the plant to public input. They even developed a game for local residents to play: an exercise that balanced time, resources and ecological concerns against possible outcomes.

Site manager Jane Powell explains that people recognized it would likely have proved impossible to make the land habitable again, free of all contamination. So the final solution was a compromise.

"The former Feed Materials Production Center was cleaned to a standard, or remediated to a standard, to allow an undeveloped park with an emphasis on wildlife," says Powell.

New mission

As part of the compromise, the Fernald workers were retrained to perform the cleanup.

Engineer Cathy Glassmeyer admits her fellow Cold War warriors were a bit skeptical at first. "When you're sitting here looking at [400 hectares], every bit of which is covered with concrete and buildings and drums and pumps and tanks and all that, it's very hard to get your imagination wrapped around what it's going to look like when all that's gone."

In the end, Glassmeyer says, the Fernald workers took as much pride in the cleanup as they had participating in the nation's defense. They came to see ecological restoration as an equally valuable contribution.

"Retirees come through here all the time," she says, adding that they're all amazed at how well the restoration worked. "[They say,] 'Wow, look what we made. We made something nice now as opposed to back when we made uranium.'"

Former US Nuclear Weapons Plant Undergoes Amazing Transformation (4)

Turning back the clock

The site has been returned to the mixed woodlands and prairie that existed in this corner of Ohio when European explorers first arrived.

Powell explains they had some guidance in choosing the correct plants. "In 1819, there was a land survey done and they noted things like the trees that were here, the grasses that were growing, and we based our seed mixes and our planting on that."

Fernald doesn't look like untamed 19th century wilderness yet. Still, the transformation is quite remarkable. And apparently, the local wildlife agrees.

Students from nearby Northwest High School have been participating in wildlife studies here for the last two years. Their teacher, Jeff Davis, is amazed at how quickly wildlife returned to site.

"I had a friend come in from Belize about a month ago," he reports, "and I brought him out here, and we're standing in a field watching an adult bald eagle soaring overhead and there are Black Necked Stilts and Wilson's Phalaropes. Two hundred species of birds on one [400 hectare] parcel of property on Southwest Ohio is pretty impressive," he concludes.

Davis describes himself as a born pessimist, especially where environmental issues are concerned, but he's clearly impressed by what the Fernald restoration has accomplished. "What I have learned from here is, if the time is spent to do it correctly, and especially if the money is available to do it correctly, things can change. Things can reverse. Things can definitely heal and things can get better."

It took ten years and 4.4 billion dollars to begin that healing process. The product of compromise, the Fernald Preserve is far from an ideal solution, but it is one community's solution for pushing the Cold War firmly into the past.

Former US Nuclear Weapons Plant Undergoes Amazing Transformation (2024)

FAQs

Is the Hanford Site still radioactive? ›

Today, there are 177 underground storage tanks on the Hanford Site, holding about 56 million gallons of highly radioactive and chemically hazardous waste – the byproduct of decades of plutonium production.

Why are thorium reactors not used? ›

Thorium (Th-232) is not itself fissile and so is not directly usable in a thermal neutron reactor. However, it is 'fertile' and upon absorbing a neutron will transmute to uranium-233 (U-233)a, which is an excellent fissile fuel materialb. In this regard it is similar to uranium-238 (which transmutes to plutonium-239).

What happened to the Los Alamos site? ›

Though the Los Alamos National Laboratory remains a research and development center for the National Nuclear Security Administration, tourists can visit important landmarks of the Manhattan Project era such as the craftsman-styled home where Oppenheimer and his family lived.

Was Los Alamos radioactive? ›

At wartime Los Alamos, small accidents and routine but dangerous tasks led to several incidents of "larger than desirable" radiation exposures to workers. In 1945, four workers working with a sample of enriched uranium received large doses of radiation when the mass reached criticality more quickly than expected.

What was the big secret of Hanford? ›

Declassified documents conceded radioactivity extensively affected the air, ground and water surrounding Hanford. The disposal tanks were found to be leaky and required a lot more maintenance than they were receiving. Water used to cool the reactors was cycled from the Columbia and back into the river.

How many people died in the Hanford chemical exposure? ›

They included 15 with Hanford connections whose cause of death was attributed by L&I to chemical exposure. Statewide, 11 Washington workers died by homicide, including nine by gunfire. They included three law enforcement officers.

Is thorium really better than uranium? ›

Thorium boasts several advantages over the conventional nuclear fuel, uranium-235. Thorium can generate more fissile material (uranium-233) than it consumes while fuelling a water cooled or molten salt reactor, and it generates fewer long-lived minor actinides than plutonium fuels.

What is the safest nuclear reactor? ›

The AP1000 is arguably the world's most advanced commercial reactor. It is designed to passively cool itself during an accidental shutdown, theoretically avoiding accidents like those at Ukraine's Chernobyl power plant and Japan's f*ckushima Daiichi.

Which country has the most thorium? ›

Detailed Solution. The correct answer is Thorium. India has the world's largest reserves of Thorium.

Why is the Trinity site only open twice a year? ›

Public access to the Trinity site is only open twice a year to comply with the military's frequent weapons testing at White Sands.

Why does Los Alamos have so many millionaires? ›

During the second world war, Los Alamos was the site of a classified research laboratory, built as part of the Manhattan Project to develop an atomic bomb. Along with Oak Ridge, Tennessee and Hanford, Washington, it was also home to a “secret city” built to house thousands of scientists, engineers and their families.

What happened to Oppenheimer's children? ›

Soon after his father died, Peter permanently moved to northern New Mexico to live at a residence his father had purchased years earlier, the Perro Caliente ranch, according to the AHF. According to the AHF, Peter still lives in New Mexico working as a carpenter and has three children: Dorothy, Charles and Ella.

Are Los Alamos still contaminated? ›

The answer, Kovac believes, is yes. That conclusion began to form when Nuclear Watch compiled data from between 1992 and 2023 for plutonium contamination below the soil, and plotted each point into the organization's now-sprawling map.

Did Manhattan Project scientists regret? ›

Oppenheimer regretted his work on the bomb and we can assume others did as well. However, many Manhattan Project scientists stayed and worked on nuclear weapons after the war.

How many scientists died at Los Alamos? ›

There are two well-known deaths that are associated with Los Alamos from the time of the Manhattan Project, Harry Daghlian and Louis Slotin. Both of these deaths were caused by criticality accidents while handling the “demon core”.

What city is still radioactive today? ›

Experts warn that the land surrounding Chernobyl is so toxic that the radiation will not decay for thousands of years. This area, called the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ), is a 2,634 square-kilometer circle that is now hostile to the life it once fostered.

Will Hanford ever be completely cleaned up? ›

Completing Hanford cleanup will take decades, but the investments we make today are needed to keep the work moving forward,” Watson said. “We will continue to advocate for sufficient funding in Washington, D.C., and get it to a level that keeps cleanup on track now and for years to come.”

Is the Hanford Site leaking? ›

Energy announced in April 2021 — following a year-long leak assessment — that Tank B-109 is leaking toxic, radioactive nuclear waste into the soil. This waste can find its way into groundwater over time and eventually reach the Columbia River.

How contaminated is the Hanford Site? ›

Today at the 580-square-mile Hanford site, the water under 65 square miles is still contaminated beyond safe drinking water limits. We continue to monitor the groundwater and the treatment activities to limit the amount of contamination entering the Columbia River.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Greg Kuvalis

Last Updated:

Views: 6295

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (75 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Greg Kuvalis

Birthday: 1996-12-20

Address: 53157 Trantow Inlet, Townemouth, FL 92564-0267

Phone: +68218650356656

Job: IT Representative

Hobby: Knitting, Amateur radio, Skiing, Running, Mountain biking, Slacklining, Electronics

Introduction: My name is Greg Kuvalis, I am a witty, spotless, beautiful, charming, delightful, thankful, beautiful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.